If the fiasco at the academic career - it's basically the process with a minus sign, success in this field is still possible to somehow measure. There Nobel Prize recognized the discovery, shiny book, there are overcrowded lecture halls. Of course, it is difficult to determine whether one versed in geology is better than the other in music, but any comparison methods exist and some choice is still possible. If the university increase - from the teacher to the dean, the dean of a vice-chancellor - were based on concrete achievements, we would have fewer doubts about the correctness of the choice. But such a system from the outset cracks - it turns out that Professor A. does not want to be a dean or provost. Yes, the campus is no more significant figures of his, but his sweet only (say), astronomy, and not administrative activities. About Professor B, economist, did not say, but his ambitions extend further: for example, he wants to become an economic adviser to the government and get a seat in the House of Lords, which is very likely. With regard to Professor B, who often appears on television, it is rarely seen in teaching and in the Committee meetings, he did not show up for several years. So until we find a suitable candidate for the post of Dean, we have to be great to go down the list, which was built according to scientific advances.
Aeliani Epistulae Et Fragmenta
Find and Download book
- Try another server.
- Try to reload page — press F5 on keyboard.
- Clear browser cache.
- Clear browser cookies.
- Try other browser.
- If you still getting an error — please contact us and we will fix this error ASAP.