Some lawyers absurd opinion concerning the publication of laws. 6. Since we see that all laws, written and unwritten, have their authority and power, depending on the will of the state, ie, the will of its representative, which is the king in a monarchy, as in other countries -.. Supreme Assembly, the surprising emergence of such opinions, which we find in the different states in the writings of prominent lawyers, directly or logically making the legislative power dependent on private individuals or subordinate judges. Such, for example, the position that the right of control over customary law belongs only to Parliament, - the correct position only where the Parliament is sovereign and can be summoned and dissolved only by its decision. For if anyone has a right to dismiss him, then he also has the right to control it and thus control its control. And if no such right is not anyone else, all right control law does not belong to Parliament, and control in parliament. And if the Parliament where he is sovereign, would be convened of representatives of his subject provinces to discuss what you want the question most numerous meeting and if this meeting consisted of the most intelligent people, yet no one would believe that such a meeting the fact of its convocation received legislative power. This is the same as the position that the two swords of state are force and justice, of which the first is in the hands of the king, and the other placed in the hands of Parliament, as might be the state, where power was in the hands of that justice had no authority to control .
Don't Forget Me
Find and Download book
- Try another server.
- Try to reload page — press F5 on keyboard.
- Clear browser cache.
- Clear browser cookies.
- Try other browser.
- If you still getting an error — please contact us and we will fix this error ASAP.